health care providers and professionals 600 words

Compare and contrast 2 of the following major types of health services professionals: physicians, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives. Include their roles, training, practice requirements, and practice settings.

quot how health care buyers make choices personal and organizational quot

  • Analyze the SWOT and FIVE Factors Analyses and determine which would be more valuable from a marketing perspective. Provide specific examples of how you could use the results of either analysis to support informed marketing efforts.
  • Recall a situation in which you sought health care of some type (not including care for an injury or illness). Determine if your situation followed the five steps of the buying decision model and what role marketing may have played in your seeking care. How does the personal decision differ from the organization buying decision process? Provide specific examples and rationale to support your response.As a reminder, please copy and paste the questions into your textbox and then underneath each one provide your response. Remember to include research to support what you say; your textbook is a required source: “How Health Care Buyers Make Choices (Personal and Organizational)” Analyze the SWOT and FIVE Factors Analyses and determine which would be more valuable from a marketing perspective. Provide specific examples of how you could use the results of either analysis to support informed marketing efforts. Explain what a SWOT analysis is to include components; do the same for Porter’s FIVE Factors Analyses. Compare/contrast the two. Then, explain in detail which one you think is more valuable from a marketing perspective and why. Remember the specific examples! Recall a situation in which you sought health care of some type (not including care for an injury or illness). Determine if your situation followed the five steps of the buying decision model and what role marketing may have played in your seeking care. How does the personal decision differ from the organization buying decision process? Provide specific examples and rationale to support your response. Discuss the FIVE steps of the buying decision model. Apply these steps to the situation you discuss and remember to elaborate on the role marketing played in your decision to seek care. What type of marketing influenced your decision to seek care from the particular healthcare provider you talk about. Take into account hos the personal decision differs from the buying decision process.

combining nurse leader with advocacy 4

Combining Nurse Leader With Advocacy

View Rubric

Max Points: 150

Details:

Rate yourself using the results from the “Nurse Manager Skills Inventory”:

http://www.aone.org/resources/nurse-manager-skills-inventory.pdf

Write a reflection of 750-1,000 words in which you identify your strengths and weaknesses related to the four content areas below:

  1. Personal and professional accountability
  2. Career planning
  3. Personal journey disciplines
  4. Reflective practice reference behaviors/tenets

Discuss how you will use your current leadership skill set to advocate for change in your workplace.

Identify one personal goal for your leadership growth and discuss your implementation plan to achieve that goal.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

View Rubrics

Top of Form

Apply Rubrics

Combining Nurse Leader With Advocacy

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
89.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

80.0 %Content

30.0 %Identification of strengths and weaknesses related to the four content areas listed.

Provides strengths and/or weaknesses based on some of the listed content areas.

Lists strengths and weaknesses based on each of the listed content areas, but does not draw on evidence from the given Web site.

Lists strengths and weaknesses based on each of the listed content areas, and draws on evidence from the given Web site for some of the content areas.

Lists strengths and weaknesses based on each of the listed content areas, and draws on evidence from the given Web site.

Lists and analyzes strengths and weaknesses based on each of the listed content areas, and draws on evidence from the given Web site.

25.0 %Discussion of use of current leadership skills to advocate change in the workplace.

Fails to mention either change in the workplace and/or personal skill set.

Discusses one change that can be made in the workplace, without providing examples or evidence. Makes brief mention of personal skill set, but does not effectively demonstrate how it can be used to effect change.

Discusses one change that can be made in the workplace, without providing examples or evidence. Evaluates how personal skill set can be used to effect change in workplace.

Discusses one change that can be made in the workplace, while giving a clear and relevant example for why the change is necessary. Evaluates how personal skill set can be used to effect change in workplace.

Discusses specific changes that can be made in the workplace are discussed, while giving clear and relevant examples for why changes are necessary. Evaluates how personal skill set can be used to effect change in workplace.

25.0 %Reflection on personal goal for leadership growth and development of implementation plan to reach goal.

Pinpoints a goal for leadership growth, but does not provide a plan for attaining the goal.

Pinpoints a goal for leadership growth, but the plan for attaining goal is not aligned to the final outcome.

Provides a surface-level reflection on areas of growth. Pinpoints at least one specific goal for leadership growth, but provides an oversimplified plan for attaining goal.

Reflects on areas for growth. Pinpoints at least one specific goal for leadership growth, and outlines a clear implementation plan to meet the goal.

Provides a thoughtful reflection on areas for growth. Pinpoints at least one specific goal for leadership growth, and outlines a well-organized and realistic implementation plan to meet the goal.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

2.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Format

3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Bottom of Form

across state health network enterprise risk management 1

Congratulations! You are promoted!

Tampa Bay Super Clinic (TBSC) has been purchased by Across State Health Network (ASHN),

whose CEO is progressive and proactive. The network is growing fast and he has decided to

adopt the enterprise risk management model (ERM). Out of the 75 facilities in the network, you stand out as the most effective risk manager. He offers you the position of Chief Risk Officer (CRO) of the network and you gladly accept it.

The facilities in the network are located in three states and vary in size between 15,000 and

60,000 square feet. All offer the same services as TBSC. Currently the facilities also vary as to

how they approach risk management. Some of them are similar to TBSC in that each has a risk

manager. Others assign risk management responsibilities to an office manager or safety

coordinator.

As the CRO, you will write a paper to recommend how the network’s risk management

organization should be structured. Specifically, you must describe (a) which personnel or unit or

department would carry out the following risk management functions and (b) the reporting

structure and working relationships of such personnel or units or departments with regard to

other operational departments of the network and the CRO:

ï‚· Incident reporting, tracking, and prevention

ï‚· Quality assurance

ï‚· Credentialing

ï‚· Security

ï‚· Claims management

ï‚· Risk management education

Remember to think about the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, documentation guidelines, malpractice, SBAR communication model, doctrine of vicarious, battery and abuse. Use your textbook and other assigned readings as appropriate for references.

The recommendations are to be presented in a 1,000-word APA-formatted paper. You may, but

are not required to, provide an organizational chart; if you do, it must comply with the APA

format for figures. Please review the HSA style guide (in the Course Resources folder)

Include at least two references from peer-reviewed journals (not counting those provided in the course materials) to support your points. Please include the rubric at the end of the document.

a health problem that is currently affecting your community

Before you start, look over the instructions for the Unit 3 Assignment. This Discussion will assist with forming your responses for the Assignment.

First, think about a health problem that you find interesting, such as a disease outbreak, chronic condition (heart disease, diabetes, etc.), or common injury in a population (falling among seniors, occupational injuries, etc.). You could also choose a health problem that is currently affecting your community.

Next, choose and research an organization that is part of the public health system (local, state, federal or global health organization, non-governmental organization, or other organization) that is addressing the health problem.

For your initial response to the Discussion, provide a brief description of the public health problem and the organization you have chosen. How is the organization actively addressing the health problem? Who are the stakeholders in the community that the organization might reach out to in partnership to address the problem?

Your two peer replies should ask probing questions about the organization or the health problem that is being addressed by your peers. You can also make additional suggestions to your peers regarding other stakeholders or organizations that might be appropriate to include when addressing the public health problem.

Be sure to include a list of credible references to support your response.

Classmate Post #1

Hello everyone,

This was a very interesting topic to discuss this week, because I got to see all different types of organizations, and how many of them come together to help the community. The health problem I decided to choose was diabetes. I found a few different organizations that target diabetes, since it is such a large and deadly problem. The organization I chose was CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation (DDT). Diabetes is a disease when the human body cannot produce or respond to insulin. Since diabetes is such a large problem, with 729 million people in the United States suffering from it, I decided it was an issue that needed to be paid attention to (“Diabetes Home,” 2018). Many people have prediabetes, while other people do not even know that they have it. It is important for people to know whether or not they have diabetes, so they can get the proper treatment. If gone un-treated, this can lead to heart disease, strokes, blindness, amputations, and even death.

The DDT program helps people with diabetes by funding states and local health departments to support their programs and activities that they provide. These programs and activities being supported and funded, help prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. Funding from the organization also goes towards improving any health outcomes for people suffering from diabetes. Funding programs in local communities and all the different states is extremely important, because it can help people who are struggling financially get help for their disease. In my opinion, people should not have to worry about their health with diabetes just because they are unable to afford help. This organization is great at helping address the problem of diabetes by not only targeting diabetes, but also targeting other diseases that can cause diabetes as well. This organization is about prevention, so that people can get the support they need without also worrying about being diagnoses with other diseases due to diabetes. DDT will help with the funding of obesity programs as well, so that people have a less likely chance to become obese, which can develop into having diabetes.

The stakeholders in the community that the organization would reach out to would be the specific state’s health department. State health departments are in charge of certain support groups and support activities that the organization would be funding. This organization also helps schools that are having diabetes and obesity problems. This would mean that another stakeholder that the organization would reach out to would be the school’s super intendent or principals of schools. Community programs are the main source to help people suffering from diabetes; so, this would mean that anyone that is in charge of support programs would be the people to talk to about setting up funds from the organization.

-Shannon Harris

References:

Diabetes Home. (2018, March 26). Retrieved June 7, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/programs/stateandloca…

Turnock, B. J. (2016). Essentials of public health (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Classmate Post #2

For this discussion topic, I chose to research Polycystic Kidney Disease. Not because I think it’s interesting but because I know I need to educate myself on it. PKD runs in my family and I have always avoided going to get myself checked. My grandfather on my mother’s side was diagnosed with it and passed very young, when my mother was only 16 years old. My mother inherited the disease, and just recently my brother had an accident at work and when he went to the doctor, they diagnosed him as well.

PKD is defined as a genetic disorder that causes many fluid-like cysts to grow in your kidneys (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2017). The Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation is the only organization in the U.S. solely dedicated to finding treatments and a cure for PKD to improve the lives of those it affects (PKD Foundation, 2018). Thankfully, On April 24, 2018 the FDA granted approval of Jynarque to be the first treatment in the U.S. for adult patients with PKD (PKD Foundation, 2018). Not only did the PKD Foundation support early studies that led to the development of Jynarque, they also helped guide patients to the clinical trials. If the PKD Foundation isn’t already partnered with the Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, who developed Jynarque, they will be in the near future to spread the word of this treatment.

References:

PKD Foundation. “JYNARQUE™ Approved as First Treatment for Polycystic Kidney Disease.” PR Newswire: News Distribution, Targeting and Monitoring, PRNewswire, 24 Apr. 2018, www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jynarque-approved-as-first-treatment-for-polycystic-kidney-disease-300635847.html.

“What Is Polycystic Kidney Disease?” National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1 Jan. 2017, www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/kidney-disease/polycystic-kidney-disease/what-is-pkd.